The Impact of a Motivation Booster in Blended Learning Experiences in Computer Science Education

The Impact of a Motivation Booster in Blended Learning Experiences in Computer Science Education

Contenido principal del artículo

Leovy Echeverría Rodríguez
Ruth Cobos


The outcomes presented in this paper are associated with the impact of motivational messages sent by a Motivation Booster to the students that participated in blended learning experiences. The aim of the Motivation Booster is to provide personalized and summarized feedback, by means of motivational messages, to the users of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning systems on their completed collaborative learning activities. The developed Motivation Booster was integrated into the Moodle system. Two blended learning experiences were put into practice at the Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana Montería (Colombia) over an academic year with students enrolled in the course called “Software Engineering” at the Computer Science Department. A group of students participated in the first blended learning experience, and they used the Moodle system without the Motivation Booster. And another group of students participated in the second blended learning experience, where they used Moodle with the developed Motivation Booster. The experimental results give us evidences that the students felt more motivated to work with the Moodle system when they received motivational messages due to the Motivation Booster. Especially students were stimulated to work in a group manner.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Biografía del autor/a (VER)

Leovy Echeverría Rodríguez, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana

Ingeniera de Sistemas por la Universidad Industrial de Santander-UIS (Colombia), Especialista en Gerencia de Sistemas de Información por la Universidad del Norte (Colombia), Magister y Doctora en Ingeniería Informática y Telecomunicaciones por la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (España). Profesora titular de la Escuela de Ingenierías y Arquitectura de la Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana Seccional Montería Colombia.

Ruth Cobos, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Ingeniera Informática en 1997 por la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) y Doctora Ingeniera Informática en 2003 por la UAM. Profesora Contratada Doctora desde 2007 en la Escuela Politécnica Superior de la UAM

Referencias (VER)

Alonso, F. et al. (2011) ‘How blended learning reduces underachievement in higher education: An experience in teaching computer sciences’, IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(3), pp. 471–478. doi: 10.1109/TE.2010.2083665.

Cocea, M. and Weibelzahl, S. (2007) ‘Cross-system validation of engagement prediction from log files’, Proceedings of Second European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 14–25. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75195-3_2.

Cocea, M. and Weibelzahl, S. (2009) ‘Log file analysis for disengagement detection in e-Learning environments’, User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(4), pp. 341–385. doi: 10.1007/s11257-009-9065-5.

Derntl, M. and Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2005) ‘The role of structure, patterns, and people in blended learning’, Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), pp. 111–130. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.03.002.

Dodero, J. M., Fernández, C. and Sanz, D. (2003) ‘An experience on students’ participation in blended vs. online styles of learning’, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, p. 39. doi: 10.1145/960492.960522.


Echeverría, L. (2011) Motivation Booster based on the monitoring of users’ progress in collaborative learning scenarios. Trabajo Fin de Master, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Figas, P., Hagel, G. and Bartel, A. (2013) ‘The furtherance of motivation in the context of teaching software engineering’, in Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013, pp. 1299–1304.

Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. et al. (2011) ‘Opening Learning Management Systems to Personal Learning Environments’, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(9), pp. 1222–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.005.

Graham, C. R. (2006) ‘Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions’, in Handbook of blended learning Global perspectives local designs, pp. 3–21. doi: 10.2307/4022859.

Graham, S. and Weiner, B. (1996) ‘Theories and principles of motivation’, in Handbook of educational psychology, pp. 63–84.

HersX hkovitz, A. and Nachmias, R. (2009) ‘Learning about Online Learning Processes and Students â€TM Motivation through Web Usage Mining’, Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5, pp. 197–214.

Hoic-Bozic, N., Mornar, V. and Boticki, I. (2009) ‘A blended learning approach to course design and implementation’, IEEE Transactions on Education, 52(1), pp. 19–30. doi: 0.1109/TE.2007.914945.

Keller, J. (1983) ‘Motivational design of instruction.’, in Instructional-design Theories and Models: An overview of their current status, Volume 1, pp. 383–434. Available at:

Keller, J. M. (2008) ‘First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning’, Distance Education, 29, pp. 175–185. doi: 10.1080/01587910802154970.

Keller, J. and Suzuki, K. (2004) ‘Learner motivation and E-learning design: A multinationally validated process’, Journal of Educational Media, pp. 229–239. doi: 10.1080/1358165042000283084.

Larson, R. C. and Murray, M. E. (2008) ‘Open educational resources for blended learning in high schools: Overcoming impediments in developing countries’, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, p. 85{textendash}103. doi: 10.1007/s003590100184.

Moodle (2019). Available at: (Accessed: 3 May 2019).

Muñoz-Merino, P. J. et al. (2014) ‘Motivation and emotions in competition systems for education: An empirical study’, IEEE Transactions on Education, 57(3), pp. 182–187. doi: 10.1109/TE.2013.2297318.

Naves, J. et al. (2013) ‘Development of tangible experiments for motivating undergraduate students’, in Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013, pp. 497–506.

Pierri et al. (2012) ‘CC-LO: Embedding Interactivity, Challenge and Empowerment into Collaborative Learning Sessions’, JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science. doi: 10.3217/jucs-018-01-0025.

Rienties, B. et al. (2012) ‘The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL’, Computers and Education, pp. 893–906. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.010.

Visser, L. et al. (2002) ‘Motivating students at a distance: The case of an international audience’, Educational Technology Research and Development, pp. 94–110. doi: 10.1007/BF02504998.

Weiner, B. (1985) ‘An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.’, Psychological review, 92(4), pp. 548–573. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548.

Wlodkowski, R. J. . (2010) ‘Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults.’, MPAEA Journal of Adult Education, 39(2), pp. 40–43. Available at: